The Roman Catholic Diocese of BrooklynAbout the DioceseOur BishopsOur ParishesOur MinistriesCatholic EducationCatholic CharitiesThe Tablet
HomeVocationsHuman ResourcesDevelopmentDonate
The Tablet - The Weekly Newspaper of the Diocese of Brooklyn
The Tablet - The Weekly Newspaper of the Diocese of Brooklyn
Inside The Tablet
Readers' Forum
Columns
Around the Diocese
Diocesan Assignments
Obituaries
Sports
Youth
Multimedia
Classifieds
Legal Notices
Services
Services
Search The Tablet
Explore Archives
Advertise
Subscribe
FAQ's
About The Tablet
Contact Us


Scandal in Albany

On Monday as Eliot Spitzer was sitting in Manhattan pondering his fate following the recent sex scandals in which he is embroiled, Cardinal Edward Egan and Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio were waiting for him in Albany. Early in the day, they learned that the governor would not be able to keep his appointment that afternoon, although at the time it was not clear why. Later in the day when the news broke about the governor’s shenanigans, it became clearer why he wasn’t in Albany.


The Bishops of New York State had gone to Albany one day prior to the New York State Catholic Conference’s public policy and lobbying day on Tuesday, March 11 (see Page 1). Catholics from all across the state travelled to the state capital to show their support for a full range of issues of importance to the Catholic community.


The Bishops scheduled a special meeting with Gov. Spitzer for the day before to voice their opposition to the horrendous path on which he has threatened to take the state in regards to abortion. In particular, they wished to object to the governor’s proposed “Reproductive Health and Privacy Protection” (RHAPP) Act.


Prior to the scheduled meeting, the Bishops had released a statement on the proposed legislation. While it is not clear at this time what repercussions the governor’s problems will have on his legislative agenda, the statement by the Bishops still holds up. We print it here in full to make clear the Church’s position on this dangerous proposal:

“This year marks the 35th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in all 50 states. We live with its tragic legacy – the loss of millions of innocent human lives and a trail of broken hearts and wounded souls.


“Yet across the country, there is cause for hope. Public opinion is moving solidly in the pro-life direction. Ultrasound technology has opened a window to the womb, revealing the humanity of the unborn child. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a ban on the gruesome procedure known as ‘partial-birth abortion,’ and most state legislatures have restricted abortion’s practice and reduced its incidence. Even in our State of New York, often cited as the ‘abortion capital’ of the United States, we have made pro-life progress, with solid investments in prenatal care and abortion alternatives, and conscience protection for those opposed to the procedure.


“In the midst of this hopefulness, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer is attempting to move our state in a decidedly opposite direction. He has put forth a radical proposal called the “Reproductive Health and Privacy Protection” (RHAPP) Act, a bill that would elevate abortion to a ‘fundamental right’ in our state, just like the right to free speech and the right to vote.


“This bill would make abortions even easier to obtain, and would ensure that late-term abortions of fully-formed infants are available in the Empire State, no matter what prohibitions the U.S. Supreme Court might one day allow. It would endanger women by allowing non-physicians to carry out abortions and imperil children by thwarting any efforts to involve parents in the abortion decisions of their children.


“No less alarming, this extremist proposal could be used to force all health care institutions, even Catholic hospitals, to provide abortions or risk the loss of their operating certificate. It could be used to compel every insurance company to pay for abortion and every health care provider to perform abortion.


“The extremism of this proposal is couched in euphemisms like ‘choice’ and ‘reproductive health care for women.’ The words have become unmoored from their meaning; they cannot mask the fact that the bill attempts to legislate approval for a procedure that is always gravely wrong. A legal system that violates the basic right to life of one human being on the grounds of the “choice” of another is fundamentally flawed.


“We do not relish a public fight with the Governor or the state legislature on this issue. However, we would be failing in our responsibility as bishops if we did not oppose it strongly. This proposal threatens the life-affirming work we do day in and day out in our hospitals and charitable agencies, in our schools, in our maternity centers and health care clinics, in our adoption and foster care programs. Compliance with such a law would violate every principle that we hold sacred.


“So oppose it we will – from our pulpits, in the media, through our advocacy network, in the legislature, and in collaboration with others who value and defend life.


“We call on all New Yorkers to contact their legislators and the Governor to make their voices heard. Offer support for those legislators who stand with us, and let those who stand with the abortion industry know that they have chosen them over you. Stand up to defend the inviolable sanctity of human life, from the first moment of creation until natural death. Pray for an end to abortion and the conditions that force women into this terrible dilemma. Let us all assist those who are pregnant, frightened and in need, to help them choose life.”

The statement was signed by Cardinal Egan and Bishop DiMarzio as well as by Bishop Howard Hubbard of Albany, Bishop Edward U. Kmiec of Buffalo, Bishop Robert J. Cunningham of Ogdensburg, Bishop Matthew H. Clark of Rochester, Bishop William F. Murphy of Rockville Centre, and Bishop James M. Moynihan of Syracuse.


As Others See It

“If yesterday sin had a rather individualistic dimension, today it has an impact and resonance that is above all social, because of the great phenomenon of globalization.


“In effect, attention to sin is a more urgent task today, precisely because its consequences are more abundant and more destructive.”

 

Bishop Gianfranco Girotti
An Official of the Apostolic Penitentiary